prickvixen: (Default)
prickvixen ([personal profile] prickvixen) wrote2005-02-12 03:10 am

(no subject)

Clerics 'triumph' in Riyadh vote: Turnout of 65 percent in historic Saudi Arabian elections (CNN)

"Prince Mansour [bin Miteb, chief of the election commission] said that of the 86,462 registered voters in the city of Riyadh, 56,354 had voted, making for a turnout of 65 percent."

Riyadh (Wikipedia)

"[Riyadh] is home to over 3,500,000 people (14% of the nation's population)."

To summarize: approximately 2.5 percent of Riyadh's population was registered to vote, and approximately 1.6 percent of the population voted.

It's a start, I guess.

[identity profile] dv-girl.livejournal.com 2005-02-12 05:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, multiply that number by two. Women aren't people, remember. They aren't allowed to vote in Saudi Arabia.

[identity profile] ocean-state.livejournal.com 2005-02-14 03:05 am (UTC)(link)
What, exactly, is the Islamic year? Isn't it something like 1465? I know it's approximately 600 years behind the Gregorian calender, since it's dated to the lifetime of the Prophet.

When I read anything about Saudi Arabia in particular, I think of the Islamic year. It's like they really are 600 years in the past. Think of Europe at that time-- woman as property, the brutal conquest of the Americas, the near-absolute authority of the Church.

One can only hope that Muslims will manage to create a more secular, freedom-loving society a little faster than the Christians.